Puggal Latest News and Events
Study Notes Puggal News Puggal Images Puggal Videos Puggal Submit News Puggal Contact US
Notes
News
Images
Videos
Submit
Contact

FN Herstal

FN Five-seveN

FN Five-seveN

Herstal are the manufacturers of FN Five-seveN, a gun, used by killers in shooting at Fort Hood Texas. The FN Five-seveN (aka the FN 5.7 or FN 57) is a 5.7 millimeter gun and available in market with these three versions that are, Five-seveN FDE, Five-seveN ODG and Five-seveN USG.
AP report says that the gun is shortly called as “cop killer”. It is a weapon that can pierce bulletproof vests and is mainly used by the drug cartels of Mexico.
But it is not cleared yet that what kind of ammunition was used. It is confirmed that the most powerful version of FN 5.7 is available only for the military personnel and law enforcement. We have no evidence that what kind of ammunition was used by the attackers in the Fort Hood.
Fn 5.7, a semi automatic pistol, is manufactured by FN Herstal has a measurement of 5.7x 28mm. The name refers its bullet diameter. It was created as a personal self defense weapon in late 1990s. Its most powerful feature is its capability to pierce the body armor and this is the reason that it is used only by the law enforcements like SWAT.
It is available in 10 round magazine, 20 round magazines and also in 30 round magazines where law allows. Magazine is made up of polymer and has four holes in the left side makes easy to estimate remaining ammunition.

Your Ad Here

Tags:

1 Comments For This Post

  1. Dave Says:

    There are a lot of misperceptions regarding the 5.7 ammo and the
    Five-seveN pistol.

    Let’s start with some basics regarding armor –

    First, there are two basic categories of armor: body armor and
    structual armor. When the military designates a particular type of
    ammo “armor piercing”, they are refering to structual armor such as
    might be found on a vehicle or fighting position. Usually this is
    hard metallic armor. Body armor is what is worn by people and often
    defeats projectiles in a much different fashion than structual armor
    and is often fabric based. Body armor (in the US) is divided into
    levels by the military and National Institute of Justice. The
    military “flak jacket” is designed to stop shrapnel from grenades and
    other explosives. Flak jackets were not designed to stop bullets.
    NIJ Levels I, IIa, II, and IIIa are all designed to stop handgun ammo
    such as .22s, .38s, 9mm, .357s, .44s amd .45s. The ratings are in
    ascending order of protection. None of these levels are rated for
    rifle projectiles. Onle NIJ Levels III and IV are rated against
    rifles, with level III rated against less powerful ammo such as that
    fired by the AK-47 and M-16 while Level IV is rated against more
    powerful rifles and some military rated AP ammo. Many none AP
    “hunting rifles” will defeat Level IV body armor.

    The military usually designates a type of ammo as “AP” if it can
    defeat a specific level of hard steel armor at a certain distance
    (such as 13mm of steel at 100 meters). The military does not
    recognize any AP rating for any handgun ammo. Handgun ammo generally
    lacks the velocity and sectional density to be “armor piercing”.

    Enter the FN 5.7mm ammo. This ammo was a kind of hybrid ammo similar
    to the .224 BOZ envisioned to bridge the gap between handgun ammo and
    rifle ammo. Basically, these are downloaded (less powerful) versions
    of the 5.56×45mm NATO ammo used in the M-16. The original idea was to
    give special units handgun ammo which could defeat the Soviet CRISAT
    body armor better than a 9mm could. Lack of velocity remained an
    issue when fired from handguns, so a new concept called a PDW
    (Personal Defense Weapon) was developed. Essentially a PDW was a
    sub-machine gun type platform. With its longer barrel, the PDW could
    get enough velocity to be effective against CRISAT body armor. FN’s
    5.7mm PDW is called the P90. If you watched the Stargate SG1 TV
    series, they routinely carried the P90 (or the PS90 civilian version
    which will not fire full-auto). Even in the P90, the 5.7mm was less
    effective than 5.56×45mm NATO ammo and its only advantage over the
    5.56 was it was slightly shorter and lighter, making it easier to
    carry more ammo. Therefore, most militaries around the world realized
    this was a solution looking for a problem and did not purchase it.

    The 5.7mm ammo original load was the SS90 which, out of the P90 had a
    modest velocity of around 853 meters per second (many hunting rifles
    run 944 m/s or faster and the 5.56 runs upward of 944 m/s with a
    projectile the same diameter and twice as heavy as the SS90). This
    was supposed to defeat the CRISAT body armor, but it could not garner
    a military AP rating. The SS90 would not correctly work in the
    Five-seveN pistol, reducing it to single shot action with manual
    reload. The SS190 was introduced to be universally compatible with
    the P90 carbine and the Five-seveN pistol, but even out of the P90
    only had a lackluster velocity of 716 m/s, which put it in the same
    kinteic energy power range as most 9mm ammo (fired from a pistol).
    Out of the Five-seveN pistol, with its shorter barrel, the SS190 was
    even less powerful with a velocity of about 650 m/s.

    When fired from a Five-seveN pistol, even the most potent 5.7mm ammo
    could only defeat NIJ Level IIa body armor, one of the lowest
    protection levels of body armor. Many 9mm loads are capable of doing
    this. Regardless, in the US the government restricted sales of some
    types of 5.7mm ammo and those particular types are not sold
    commercially.

    When it comes to terminal performance, extensive testing has shown
    that the 5.7mm bullets, especially when hitting at less than 792 m/s,
    do not perform well. Any decent 9mm hollow point is far more
    devastating.

    The bottom line is that the 5.7mm ammo and the Five-seveN pistol are
    not AP rated and are rather lack luster performers despite the hype
    surrounding them. There is little the 5.7mm and Five-seveN can do
    that a common 9mm will not.

    As crass as it sounds, people were lucky that the shooter believed the
    hype and chose the Five-seveN and not a standard 9mm like a Glock,
    Beretta, Walther, etc. Had he chosen a 9mm, more people would
    probably have died.

    v/r

    Dave H.
    Deputy Sheriff
    Law enforcement and civilian arms instructor
    Certified law enforcement armorer
    Retired military combat veteran and former military arms instructor

Categorized | Information

  • Popular
  • Latest
  • Comments
  • Tags
  • Subscribe